HIGHLY EXCITED MOLECULAR STATES: QUANTUM DEFECT THEORY AND AB INITIO THEORY
Loading...
Date
2003
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ohio State University
Abstract
Full first principles calculations of highly excited complex structures and many-channel decay processes have been carried out in the past for atoms, usually by a combination of ab initio methods (e.g. R- matrix theory) with multichannel quantum defect theory (MQDT). A beautiful example is afforded by the work of Johnson $et al.^{1}$ on several rare gas atoms, where the first principles relativistic multichannel calculations were of such quality that they could be confronted directly with highly resolved experimental cross sections. Predictions of comparable completeness and accuracy are much rarer in the domain of molecular physics, because ab initio computations must be carried out and optimized for many nuclear geometries, and the nuclear (non-Born-Oppenheimer) dynamics greatly complicates the issue. In the present contribution molecular examples will be described where highly excited bound states have been calculated ab initio correctly on the scale of $1cm^{-1} (CaF, n^{\ast} {\sim} 15)$ and of $1MHz (H_{2}, n^{\ast} {\sim} 55)$. The first of these $examples^{2}$ corresponds to a highly excited electron with principal quantum number $n^{\ast}{\sim} 15$ which interacts with a rotating strongly dipolar ion core. In the second example ultra-high Rydberg states with $n^{\ast} {\sim} 55$, situated $30cm^{-1}$ below the ionization limit, have been excited and their hyperfine structure fully $resolved.^{3}$ In the calculations account must be taken of the couplings between the excited electron inluding its spin, with the electronic and nuclear spins of the $H^{+}_{2}$ ion core. The various steps and developments will be described which have been necessary to achieve such accuracy. Some recent developments in the field of molecular R- matrix theory and the ab initio prediction of molecular wave packet motion will also be mentioned.
Description
(1) W. R. Johnson, K. T. Cheng. K.-N. Huang, and M. LeDourneuf, Phys. Rev. A 22, 989 (1980). (2) C. M. Gittins, N. A. Harris, M. Hui, and R. W. Field, Can. J. Phys. 79, 247 (2001). (3) A. Osterwalder, R. Seiler, and F. Merkt, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7939 (2000).
Author Institution: Laboratoire Aim\'{e} Cotton du CNRS, Universit\'{e} de Paris-Sud
Author Institution: Laboratoire Aim\'{e} Cotton du CNRS, Universit\'{e} de Paris-Sud