MICROWAVE SPECTRUM OF $CO_{2}-HBR$: IMPLICATIONS ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE DYNAMICS OF THE PHOTOINITIATED $H + CO_{2}$ REACTION IN THE CLUSTER

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

1995

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ohio State University

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The microwave spectrum of HBrCO2 has been analyzed using a model developed by Baiochi and Klemperer1 to estimate both the equilibrium position of the H atom in the complex and the HBr bending amplitude. We find that the complex has a T-shaped heavy atom frame with the H atom directed away from the CO2 subunit, as initially inferred by Zengetal.2 from the infared spectrum. The equilibrium C-BrH angle is-103, where 180 coresponds to a linear C-BrH configuration. Modeling the large-amplitude HBr bending vibration allows us to estimate zero-point probabilities for various values of the C-BrH angle. These probabilities are compared with results from dynamical calculations3 undertaken to interpret the OH product state distributions4 resulting from the photolysis of HBr in the HBrCO2 cluster. We find that the probabilities for C-BrH angles less than 25,50,75, and 100 are < 0.001%, 0.14%, 6%, and 44%, respectively. From combined ab initio and quasiclassical trajectory calculations, Kudla and Schatz3 estimate that the reaction probability is only 3 for C-BrH angles between 0 and 28, with larger angles giving even smaller probabilities. These results suggest that the quantum yield for the photoinitiated H+CO2 reaction in HBrCO2 must be extremely small or that the conditions of the precursor limited reaction are still not fully understood. The difficult measurement of the absolute quantum yield in the photodissociation experiments is important to more fully understand the mechanism for the formation of OH radicals from a presumably very unfavorable initial reactant orientation.

Description

1F.A. Baiocchi and W. Klemperer, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 3509 (1983). 2Y.P. Zeng, S.W. Sharpe, S.K. Shin, C. Wittig, and R.A. Beaudet, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 5392 (1992). 3K. Kudla and G.C. Schatz, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 8267 (1991). 4S. Buelow, G. Radhakrishnan, J. Catanzarite, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys, 83, 444-445 (1985).


Author Institution: Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6111, Washington, D.C. 20375-5000; NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Keywords

Citation