VIBRATIONAL BAND INTENSITIES \& MOLECULAR CONSTANTS PART 2 - RAMAN AND INTENSITY BOND POLARIZABILITY DERIVATIVES OF HYDROCARBONS

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

1981

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ohio State University

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This work demonstrates the relative applicability of three available relations for obtaining absolute Raman intensities, viz. Long and Plane Method (L&P), Lippincott & Nagarajan Method (L&N) and Fontal & Spiro Method (F&S) in the case of simple hydrocarbon systems and halogenated methanes. Thus bond polarizability derivatives, $\partial^{\alpha}/ {\partial R} C-x;X=H, Cl, F $ and α/Rcc for CH4,C2H4,C2H6,C2H2,CCl4,CF4andC6H6 have been computed and compared with experimental 1 and theoretical 2 Raman electro-optical parameters. The computed values of α(CH) by all the three methods for C-H bond vary according to the trend; αCH(C2H2)<C2H4<C6H6<CH4<C2H6 whereas observed values show a trend αCH(C6H6)<C2H2<C2H4CH4<C2H6. The αCH were also found to very according to the hybridization as αCHSp1(C2H6&CH4)>αCHsp2(C6H6&C2H4)>αCHSb(C2H2) contrary to the observation made by Yoshino & Bernstein1. The calculated values of α(CC) follow the trend; α(cc)(C2H2)>(C2H4)>(C2H6) which shows that πbonds contribute more to the bond polarizabllity derivatives. The value of αccbyF&Smethod(0.90\AA2) for $ C{2}H_{6} $ coincides with that observed experimentally (0.92 \AA2) while other systems have quite away. The L&N method gives a value of 2.76 \AA2 much closer to observed one (2.92\AA2) for C2H2 while L & P method yields a value 2.47\AA2 more closer to the observed one (1.89\AA2for C2H6. The observed value for $ C_{2}H_{6} \alpha^{\prime} c-c (1.54) \AA^{2}$ which lies between thise for C2H6(0.92\AA2and C2H4(1.89\AA2 could not be reproduced by any of the three methods, may be due to over simplified picture of chemical binding adopted in the models and addition of π-bonds in case of C6H6 places a great strain on the model. 1. T. Yoshino & H.J, Bernstein, Intensity in Raman Effect, Proceedings of the Institute of Petroleum, London (1958). 2. S. Abbate, M. Gussoni & G. Zerbi, Indian J. Pure & Applied Phys., 16, 119 (1978)

Description

Author Institution:

Keywords

Citation