Illicit Acceptability in picture NPs

Thumbnail Image

Files

WPL_38_July_1990_054.pdf (998.27 KB)

Date

1990-07

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ohio State University. Department of Linguistics

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Four experiments examine the interaction between extraction and specificity in picture NPs. The results indicate that the acceptability judgements of naive speakers show highly robust patterns that do not conform well to widely held assumptions about the relative acceptability of several theoretically important kinds of sentence. There is also evidence that the difference between argument and non-argument extractions has a marked impact on acceptability (though no such acceptability difference has figured in linguistic theory). Further, the paper argues that there are circumstances in which ungrammatical sentences may be rendered acceptable via the intrusion of extragrammatical mechanisms in comprehension. Thus, the acceptability of these sentences is 'illicit'.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Working Papers in Linguistics, no. 38 (1990), 54-66.

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/1811/81758

Collections

Working Papers in Linguistics: Volume 38 (July 1990)