ACCURATE MOLECULAR CONSTANTS, POTENTIAL CURVE AND BORN-OPPENHEIMER BREAKDOWN CORRECTION FUNCTIONS FOR $X^{1}\Sigma^{+}_{g}$ MgH and MgD

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2001

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ohio State University

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

New high resolution Fourier Transform spectra of the 0−3, 0−4, 1−3, 1−4 and 1−5 bands of the B2Σ+X2Σ+ transition of MgH, together with lines from sunspot spectra coupling B -state levels v=0&1 to X-state levels v=3−8, combined with older BX band dataa involving v(X)=3−9 and v(B)v=0−9 and ground-state 2−1 and 1−0 infrared data, yield a description of the ground state for v=0−2 and v=3−9. The v=2−3 gap was bridged using transitions from the 1−2 and 1−3 bands of the A2ΠX2Σ+ spectrum. In order to avoid complications due to perturbations in the excited state, all of these electronic band data were re-arranged and treated as fluorescence series into the ground state. The resulting data set consisted of a total of 4140 transitions for six isotopomers of MgH and MgD. We have performed two types of combined isotopomer analyses of these data. (i) A fit to empirical Dunham-type expansions which included hydrogenic Born-Oppenheimer breakdown correction terms required 54 expansion parameters, plus the 701 fluorescence series'' origins. However, the resulting empirical centrifugal distortion constants will be unreliable for extrapolation to J values significantly higher than those included in the data set. (ii) An equally good fit to an analytic model potential energy function plus adiabatic and non-adiabatic radial Born-Oppenheimer breakdown correction functions required only 21 potential and correction-function parameters, plus the 701 fluorescence series'' origins. The resulting potential function has the MLJ form,b and was constrained to have the correct C6/R6 long-range behaviour, so it should prove highly reliable for extrapolations in v or J. The parameter-fit and potential-fit computer programs used for this analysis were DSParFit and DSPotFit.c

Description

aW.J. Balfour and H.M. Cartwright, Can. J. Phys. 54, 1898 (1976); W.J. Balfour and B. Lindgren, Can. J. Phys. 56, 767 (1978). bP.H. Hagigeorgiou and R.J. Le Roy, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3949 (2000). cProgram source code and manuals available through the ``Computer Programs'' link on the www site http://leroy.uwaterloo.ca.


Author Institution: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Waterloo; Guelph-Waterloo Centre for Graduate Work in Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Waterloo; Guelph-Waterloo Centre for Graduate Work in Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona

Keywords

Citation