How does threat affect different types of people? Investigating a relationship between Big-Five personality and self-concept, and how threat may affect a self-concept network
Loading...
Date
2020-05
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Ohio State University
Abstract
In this exploratory project, we aim to draw connections between Big-5 personality, threat,
and self-concept. In the experiment, participants first completed the Big-5 inventory of
personality measuring openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and
neuroticism, five mostly independent traits that form a broad picture of personality (John et al.,
2008; John et al., 1991; Benet-Martinez & John, 1998). Next, participants were randomly
assigned to a threat or non-threat condition. Threat was manipulated using mortality salience, a
prompt in which participants were asked to write specifically about their bodily reaction to death,
a domain non-specific threat (Rosenblatt et al., 1989). After the threat manipulation, self-concept
measures were administered. Self-concept has been operationalized here as a network, adapting
research on social networks to a self- and identity-based model. The self-concept network is
created by having participants list 15 personal identities, rate each identity's importance, and
then determine how related each identity is to the others. Similar to a social network, clusters
emerge that determine which identities are most important to the self. During data coding, each
of these identities were rated by two judges blind to condition as either agentic or communal. No
significant results were found for threat as a main effect and for personality as a moderator of the
relationship between threat and identities. However, people significantly listed more agentic
identities than communal, and more agentic identities and higher agentic importance were
marginally correlated with higher self-concept clarity and positive affect, possibly suggesting
more comfort in understanding more self-focused identities. There was also a marginally
significant increase in perceived importance of all identities and marginally significant increase
in agentic identities after threat. In future research, we would like to replicate this research with more participants, different threat manipulations, more focused independent variables, and also
explore differences in how people rate their own identities.
Description
Keywords
Threat, Personality, Self-Concept, Self-Concept Network