Ankieta do ankietera: źródło informacji czy dezinformacji o wywiadzie kwestionariuszowym?
Loading...
Date
1996
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
IFiS Publishers
Abstract
This paper deals with the question of the utility of an interview schedule as filled
out by interviewer after the interrogation. They regard it as a tool that helps to assess
quality of collected data. I analyze, here, answers given by the same interviewers
to identical questions, but coming from two different interview schedules as
well as answers by different interviewers coming from the same interview. Basing
on this I attempt to determine whether their reports are valid source in assessment
of quality of collected information. Data come from reports given in Appendixes
to interviewers in the Polish General Social Survey 1994 and from the methodological
research as appended to the PGSS. I compare these reports taking into account:
(i) missing informations and (ii) their credibility (extent to which answers given
by the same interviewers to the same questions correspond to each other).
The analysis shows that reports given by interviewer in an appendix to the interview
schedule can by no means serve as a source of evaluation of collected data.
It looks to be only preliminary basis in the assessment of validity.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ask: Research and Methods. Volume 4, Issue 2 (1996), pp. 37-55