Show simple item record

dc.creatorSzalai, Imre S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T17:49:49Z
dc.date.available2021-05-13T17:49:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationOhio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, vol. 32, no. 1 (2017), 75-110.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1046-4344 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/92715
dc.descriptionPublished in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutionen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State University. Moritz College of Lawen_US
dc.rightsThis item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law.en_US
dc.titleDIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia: How the Supreme Court Used a Jedi Mind Trick to Turn Arbitration Law Upside Downen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record