Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShoots-Reinhard, Brittany
dc.creatorReiter, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-03T20:26:49Z
dc.date.available2021-05-03T20:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/92664
dc.description.abstractPolitical conservativism has been associated with lower cognitive ability, including lower numeracy (math ability) and higher perceptions of their own ability including higher perceived math ability (numeric self-efficacy). It has been suggested that this is evidence of overconfidence on the part of conservatives, but conservatism has not been linked with overconfidence per se. In the current research, we investigated correlations of political conservatism with cognitive ability, self-efficacy, and measures of overconfidence, including overestimation of the number of items correctly answered on a test of numeracy and over placement of math ability relative to others. We also measured additional ability measures, education, general self-efficacy, and narcissism (a general measure of overconfidence). Cognitive ability was operationalized through a basic mathematics test, spatial reasoning, and a basic vocabulary test. Each ability variable was correlated with one another, and a standardized ability variable was created. We used a sample of N= 831 MTurk workers recruited from Cloud Research. We found only ability, self-efficacy, numeric efficacy (i.e., not measures of overconfidence) predicted ideology. In an exploratory regression using measures of numeric confidence, narcissism, general self-efficacy, cognitive ability, and education, greater conservatism was associated with lower ability, b(se)= −0.166 (0.057), p=.004, higher general self-efficacy, b(se)= 0.171 (0.051), p=.001, and higher subjective numeracy b(se)= 0.080 (0.037), p=.033. Based on these findings, we suggest the relationship between political ideology and numeracy is better stated as an issue of confidence rather than overconfidence. It appears that conservatives have generally high efficacy, but when asked to give specific judgments about their ability, they do not systematically overestimate it.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Undergraduate Research Scholarship offered $5,000 to go towards tuition during the completion of this project.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Psychology Undergraduate Research Theses; 2021en_US
dc.subjectideologyen_US
dc.subjectpoliticsen_US
dc.subjectconfidenceen_US
dc.subjectcognitive abilityen_US
dc.subjectnumeracyen_US
dc.titlePolitical Ideology, Confidence, & Cognitive Abilityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoNo embargoen_US
dc.description.academicmajorAcademic Major: Psychologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record