Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNyseth Brehm, Hollie
dc.creatorWise, Jamie
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T18:53:26Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T18:53:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/91723
dc.description.abstractIn the aftermath of violent conflicts, societies often implement transitional justice mechanisms—like trials, truth commissions, and reparations programs—to reckon with past human rights abuses and atrocity crimes. Recent scholarship has begun to consider who prefers which justice mechanisms and why, recognizing the context-dependence of justice preferences and seeking to better articulate the needs of those affected by violence. This study qualitatively explores the influence of individuals' conflict-related ideologies, consisting of their ideas about the conflict and the actors involved, on their transitional justice preferences. Using the ongoing conflict in Syria as a case study, this research draws from 44 interviews with Syrians—eight conducted by the author in Jordan in 2018, and 36 conducted through the Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) in 2013. During interviews, participants described their perceptions of the cause of the violence, their attitudes about the actors involved in the conflict, and their preferences for various mechanisms of transitional justice. Employing qualitative analytic methods, this study describes patterns that inductively emerged from participants' explanations of their justice preferences. It finds that participants can be categorized into three distinct Opinion Clusters—extreme, solid, or leaning—based on their perceptions of us vs. them, their framing of the conflict, and their transitional justice preferences. These ideal type categories were identified across both pro- and anti-regime participants, and they illustrate how differences in participants' conflict-related ideologies may inform differences in their transitional justice preferences. This discovery attests to the social construction of justice preferences, which are embedded in the complex meanings individuals ascribe to their lived experiences of conflict. This research connects literature on the social psychological dimensions of conflict to scholarship on transitional justice, and its findings can inform future policy, particularly the design of a tailored justice process for Syria.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Research Grant for Undergraduates in Arts and Sciences, Honors Programen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Sociology Honors Theses; 2020en_US
dc.subjectSyrian Civil Waren_US
dc.subjectTransitional Justiceen_US
dc.subjectIdeologyen_US
dc.subjectHuman Rightsen_US
dc.subjectConflicten_US
dc.titleTransitional Justice Preferences Among Syrians: A Qualitative Explorationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoNo embargoen_US
dc.description.academicmajorAcademic Major: International Studiesen_US
dc.description.academicmajorAcademic Major: Sociologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record