Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShah, Jami
dc.creatorChaudhury, Kreteeka
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-22T21:18:00Z
dc.date.available2020-01-22T21:18:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/90829
dc.description.abstractIn mass production, for ensuring interchangeability of parts and proper function, design engineer needs to specify the range of geometric and dimensional variations that is acceptable. This is done using Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) which has classified 14 different types of geometric characteristics needed for specification. When designers develop a GD&T scheme, they need to ensure that dependent dimensions such as clearances are within range to allow assembly and proper function. This requires analysis of the tolerance scheme. 3-D tolerance analysis is a non-linear problem that cannot be expressed in closed form so various simplified methods have been devised to do tolerance analysis. One of them is called 1-D minimum and maximum chart, which does tolerance analysis in one direction control at a time so it misses out in any couplings between the directions. However, it is still accurate for certain type of assemblies such as disk stack on a single shaft in a turbine. So, because of its simplicity it is a popular method used by many designers. However, the procedure is manual and requires mastering a large number of rules, each specific to a tolerance class to make the chart. The purpose of this project is to automate the 1-D tolerance analysis process by making a 1-D Tolerance Stack Automate that will have all the tolerance analysis rules embedded in it and will perform the stack calculations automatically, freeing the user from learning the rules. The tool has been developed within MS Excel. Six files were made to incorporate all the rules based on tolerance class, based on the types of user inputs and similarity in rules required to perform the analysis. These six files are: (1) Size and basic dimension; (2) Runout and concentricity; (3) Profile; (4) Orientation and form (not FOS); (5) Orientation, straightness and cylindricity (FOS); (6) Position. Then each of these files were combined into one master MS Excel file. In total 11 test cases were performed on the individual files and the master file using different geometric parts so that each condition is evaluated. The results from 1-D chart performed in Excel have been verified with those performed manually as both the approaches used standard GD&T rules.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Honors Theses; 2018en_US
dc.subjectGD&Ten_US
dc.subjectToleranceen_US
dc.subjectGeometric dimensioning and tolerancingen_US
dc.subjectWorst case tolerance analysisen_US
dc.subject1D maximum and minimum tolerance charten_US
dc.title1-D Tolerance Chart Automateen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoA one-year embargo was granted for this item.en_US
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen_US
dc.rights.ccurihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/en_US
dc.description.academicmajorAcademic Major: Mechanical Engineeringen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States