Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/81526

dc.creatorAnderson, Cory
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-07T23:36:49Z
dc.date.available2017-11-07T23:36:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies v. 5, no. 2 (2017), p. 196-238.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2471-6383
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18061/1811/81526
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/81526
dc.description.abstractWerner Enninger embodies the highest standards of methodological rigor and theoretical insight in Amish studies, and this article synthesizes his 30-some publications written in English. Enninger was a socio-linguist from Germany who conducted field research in Delaware in the 1970s and published intensely in the 1980s. His mixed methods address common hurdles field researchers face and offer meticulously detailed qualitative and quantitative data. Enninger's theory can be organized around a social system model that fuses structural functionalism and symbolic interactionism. Within the model, he proposes a four-part superstructure—(1) core, group-defining values, namely, religious community and separation, (2) are realized in concrete norms in timeless (e.g. New Testament) and time-specific (e.g. Ordnung) ways (3) that are internalized, (4) producing an orderly role system. The role system is accessible to system actors, who assume roles through identifiable symbols (role attributes), notably, dress configurations. Mutual identification of alter distributes role privileges in the ensuing interaction and triggers language choice. The enactment of roles defines the social situation. Social situations of central importance to the brotherhood have fixed roles that are assumed and ascribed, with strong sanctions for deviance. Peripheral social situations permit greater role making, where roles are negotiated, ascribed statuses are reduced, and social sanctions are fewer. Peripheral social situations are the primary source for social change. Enninger's work is not for the faint-of-mind or impatient, yet provides a much-needed source of inspiration to strengthen future Amish studies research, theoretically and methodologically.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State University. Librariesen_US
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright ownership of this article. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the author.en_US
dc.subjectEthnography of communicationen_US
dc.subjectGrooming and garment patternsen_US
dc.subjectDressen_US
dc.subjectPennsylvania Germanen_US
dc.subjectAmish educationen_US
dc.subjectAmish ritualen_US
dc.subjectAscribed statusen_US
dc.subjectRole theoryen_US
dc.subjectSemioticsen_US
dc.subjectSociolinuisticsen_US
dc.subjectStructural functionalismen_US
dc.subjectSymbolic interactionismen_US
dc.subjectSuperstructureen_US
dc.subjectUniversity of Essenen_US
dc.subjectKarl-Heinz Wandten_US
dc.subjectJoachim Raithen_US
dc.subjectDover, Deleware, Amishen_US
dc.titleThe Undistinguished Scholar of the Amish, Werner Enninger, -or- Has the Time Yet Come for Rigorous Theory in Amish Studies?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record