Show simple item record

dc.creatorSampson, Salena
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-28T22:22:39Z
dc.date.available2017-06-28T22:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationWorking Papers in Linguistics, no. 59 (2010), 33-43.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0473-9604 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/81003
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the variation between the emergent genitive its and the periphrastic form of it in Early Modern English, situating this case in the larger picture of English genitive variation. As previous studies have often focused on non-pronominal possessors (given that Present Day English pronominal possessors often appear prenominally, with limited variation), this early pronominal genitive variation provides unique insight as it illustrates some of the same factors significant in pronominal genitive variation as in other cases. Additionally, as neuter pronouns commonly correlate with inanimate referents, this variation provides new evidence on the independence of weight and animacy in genitive variation. The importance of another factor, pressure from the pronoun paradigm, is also illustrated.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State University. Department of Linguisticsen_US
dc.rightsThis object is protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.en_US
dc.titleThe Early Modern English Genitive Its and Factors Involved in Genitive Variationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record