Show simple item record

dc.contributorBlalock, Steven
dc.creatorParker, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-17T19:24:04Z
dc.date.available2016-09-17T19:24:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/78191
dc.description.abstractDuring the first half of the Cold War, the superpowers endeavored mightily to “win hearts and minds” abroad through what came to be called public diplomacy. Many of the target audiences were on the Cold War front-lines in Europe. However, other, larger ones resided in areas outside Europe then in the throes of decolonization. Among the latter, for all the blood and drama of war, intervention, crisis, and revolution, the vast majority experienced the Cold War as public diplomacy; as, essentially, a media war for their allegiance rather than as a violent war for their lives. In these areas, superpower public diplomacy encountered a set of challenges around the issues of race, empire, poverty, and decolonization– all of which were in volatile flux, as they intersected with the dynamics of the Cold War, and with anti-imperialist currents long coursing. The challenge to U.S. public diplomacy was acute. At a time when the image of the United States abroad was inseparable from Jim Crow and from Washington’s European-imperial alliances, the cresting of these issues put U.S. outreach unavoidably on the defensive. Yet the greater consequence of these Cold War campaigns was not for U.S. foreign policy, but rather for postwar international history– when the non-European world responded to this media war by joining it. Newly independent voices in India, Egypt, Ghana, and elsewhere launched public-diplomacy campaigns of their own, making for a crowded field by the 1960s. In addition to offering a roundabout validation of the strategic importance of public diplomacy, this proliferation of voices articulated a different vision of the postwar world. Reappropriating the geopolitical and intellectual space left between the poles of the superpower conflict, this global conversation formulated what Vijay Prashad calls the Third World project, around a nucleus of nonalignment, post-imperial economic development, and anti-colonial racial solidarity. The global-South response to the injection of the Cold War into their environs thereby helped to coalesce the “Third World” as a transnational imagined community on the postwar global landscape.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOhio State University. Mershon Center for International Security Studiesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsEvent web page, Streaming video, Event photosen_US
dc.format.extentVideo Duration: 01:19:15en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State University. Mershon Center for International Security Studiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMershon Center for International Security Studies. Diplomatic History Speaker Series.en_US
dc.subjectCold Waren_US
dc.subjectpublic diplomacyen_US
dc.subjectmediaen_US
dc.titleHearts, Minds, Voices: Cold War Public Diplomacy and the Formation of the 'Third World’en_US
dc.typeImageen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.typeVideoen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record