Show simple item record

dc.creatorJory, Katie
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-10T23:24:33Z
dc.date.available2016-05-10T23:24:33Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationOhio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, vol. 24, no. 2 (2009), 315-348.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1046-4344 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/76887
dc.descriptionPublished in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutionen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State University. Moritz College of Lawen_US
dc.rightsThis item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law.en_US
dc.titleMandatory Arbitration Clauses in Payday Lending Loans: How the Federal Courts Protect Unfair Lending Practices in the Name of Anti-Protectionismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record