Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDietrich, Richard
dc.creatorBrackman, Kyle
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-27T15:34:49Z
dc.date.available2016-04-27T15:34:49Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/76695
dc.descriptionBusiness/Education/Speech and Hearing Science (The Ohio State University Denman Undergraduate Research Forum)en_US
dc.description.abstractIn 2014, more than 500 companies or over 3% of all public companies filed a Form 8-K Item 4.02 disclosure indicating that a previously issued financial statement should not be relied upon due to a material error. These material errors mislead investors, creditors, and other stakeholders. Therefore, such a company is subsequently required to issue corrected financial statements through a Form 10-K/A disclosure. By understanding the underlying errors that drive companies to restate, accountants can take actions to minimize the quantity of restatements. Previous research has examined the relationship between the passage of time and the number of restatements. This study adds to the discussion by describing reasons that companies restate and the associated trends. Audit Analytics database provided by Wharton Research Data Services was used to analyze all Item 4.02 disclosures from 2004 to 2014. These restatements were classified by whether clerical error, fraud, accounting error, or another type of error led the company to restate their financials. The results indicate that the proportion of restatements explained by clerical errors has fallen from over 14% in 2008 to about 1% in 2014. The proportion of restatements explained by fraud has fallen from over 3% in 2004 to under 1% in 2014. As a result, the proportion of restatements explained by accounting errors has increased from about 86% in 2008 to over 98% in 2014. These results are consistent with the presumption that increased regulation, technology, and education may reduce fraud and clerical error over time. The total number of restatements has more than doubled since 2008 despite evident decreases in the proportion of restatements explained by clerical error and fraud. As the proportion of restatements explained by accounting errors predominates, actions must be taken to reduce accounting error and consequently diminish the total number of restatements.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2016 Richard J. and Martha D. Denman Undergraduate Research Forum. 21sten_US
dc.subjectRestatementsen_US
dc.subjectTrendsen_US
dc.subjectAccountingen_US
dc.subjectErroren_US
dc.titleTrends in Reasons for Restatementsen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.type.genrePosteren_US
dc.description.academicmajorAcademic Major: Accountingen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record