Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGrimsley, Mark
dc.creatorFry, Zachery
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-12T16:30:09Z
dc.date.available2016-04-12T16:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/76410
dc.descriptionHumanities: 1st Place (The Ohio State University Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Army of the Potomac was the most politically unstable and problematic of all the Union field armies in the Civil War. This project examines the partisan divide within the army by exploring the extent to which such issues as emancipation and conscription caused heated disagreement from the top of the command chain down to the enlisted men. Soldiers often carried out these debates in the public eye by contributing to newspaper columns, which in turn influenced the northern public sphere. The dissertation also tracks the process by which Republicans in the army were able to monopolize the concept of wartime loyalty by 1863 to mean a disavowal of many in the Democrat Party. When former General George B. McClellan emerged as the Democrat standard bearer in 1864, soldiers turned on their old commander and voted instead for Lincoln and the war platform.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2016 Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum. 30then_US
dc.subjectCivil Waren_US
dc.subjectHistoryen_US
dc.subjectPolitical cultureen_US
dc.subjectMilitary historyen_US
dc.subjectAmerican historyen_US
dc.titleLincoln's Divided Legion: Emancipation and the Political Culture of the Army of the Potomac, 1861-1865en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.description.embargoA five-year embargo was granted for this item.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record