Show simple item record

dc.creatorRousseau, Liane
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-19T18:02:48Z
dc.date.available2016-02-19T18:02:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationOhio State Law Journal Furthermore, vol. 76 (2015), 147-153.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/75514
dc.descriptionCommenting on Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc., 772 F.3d 1056 (6th Cir. 2014).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State University. Moritz College of Lawen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOhio State Law Journal Sixth Circuit Review, Volume 76 (2015).en_US
dc.rightsThis item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law.en_US
dc.titleWhistle While You Work: The Gap in Whistleblower Protection Exposed by the Sixth Circuiten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record