Show simple item record

dc.creatorGolay, Marcel J. E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-15T12:43:01Z
dc.date.available2006-06-15T12:43:01Z
dc.date.issued1954en_US
dc.identifier1954-N-2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/7301
dc.description$^{*}$In collaboration with the Engineering Dept. of the Perkin-Elmer Corporation.en_US
dc.descriptionAuthor Institution: Ridge Road and Auldwood Laneen_US
dc.description.abstractThe chopped-beam, double-beam, and double-pass methods, and combinations and variations of these, have sparked the development of various spectrometric systems, and suggest other, yet untried, systems. The following systems are discussed qualitatively as to convenience and freedom of errors, and are compared quantitatively to the single-pass chopped-beam (first harmonic only) as to noise factor (n. f.): DC thermocouple (n.f., .45) Single-beam single-pass (n.f., 1.00) Double-beam single-pass (n.f., 1.00) Single-beam double-pass (n.f., 1.00) Halford-Savitzky twin-beam (n.f., 2.30) Hornig double-beam (n.f., 1.62) A modified Hornig double-beam (n.f., 1.09) The speaker’s twin-beam phase system, developed at the Eppley Laboratory (n.f., 2.37 and 2.85, the latter permitting double-pass operation). A twin-beam phase system with phase nulling (n.f., 1.12) A double-beam double-pass system proposed by Coates-Scott (n.f., 2.00) A modified Coates-Scott system (n.f., 1.62) A double-beam double-pass phase system (n.f., 2.11)en_US
dc.format.extent112214 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeimage/jpeg
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherOhio State Universityen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF VARIOUS SPECTROMETRIC $SYSTEMS^{*}$en_US
dc.typearticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record