On the Limits and Possibilities of Causal Explanation with Game Theoretical Models: The Case of Two Party Competition
Creators:Mueller, Georg P.
models of competition for scarce goods
MetadataShow full item record
Citation:Ask: Research and Methods. Volume 21, Issue 1 (2012), pp. 69-85
Regression-based path- and structural equation-models have two major drawbacks, if they are used for the causal explanation of social phenomena: they are too deterministic and neglect the intentions of the concerned actors as a central driving force of the analysed processes. In order to explain the distribution-effects of two party competition, this article proposes an alternative modelling approach, which is based on the mathematical theory of repeated games. The article explores the limits and possibilities of this approach with regard to the causal explanation of social phenomena and compares the results with the capabilities of the regression approach. It turns out that game theoretical models are especially useful for explaining the non-presence of social phenomena under given causal conditions.
Rights:This item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law. We are eager to hear from any copyright holders who are not properly identified.
Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.