Ankieta do ankietera: źródło informacji czy dezinformacji o wywiadzie kwestionariuszowym?
MetadataShow full item record
Other Titles:lnterview schedule for an interviewer. Is this valid information or disinformation about an interview?
Citation:Ask: Research and Methods. Volume 4, Issue 2 (1996), pp. 37-55
This paper deals with the question of the utility of an interview schedule as filled out by interviewer after the interrogation. They regard it as a tool that helps to assess quality of collected data. I analyze, here, answers given by the same interviewers to identical questions, but coming from two different interview schedules as well as answers by different interviewers coming from the same interview. Basing on this I attempt to determine whether their reports are valid source in assessment of quality of collected information. Data come from reports given in Appendixes to interviewers in the Polish General Social Survey 1994 and from the methodological research as appended to the PGSS. I compare these reports taking into account: (i) missing informations and (ii) their credibility (extent to which answers given by the same interviewers to the same questions correspond to each other). The analysis shows that reports given by interviewer in an appendix to the interview schedule can by no means serve as a source of evaluation of collected data. It looks to be only preliminary basis in the assessment of validity.
Rights:This item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law. We are eager to hear from any copyright holders who are not properly identified.
Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.