Public Policy for Agriculture After Commodity Programs
MetadataShow full item record
Publisher:Ohio State University. Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics
Series/Report no.:Ohio State University. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology. ESO (Economics and Sociology Occasional Paper). No. 2321
The Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act of 1996 opted for the market rather than the government to allocate resources and set returns in agriculture. A modest safety net of marketing loans and crop insurance remains but the era in which government managed the supply of major crops appears to be ending. The objective of this paper is to consider appropriate public policy for American agriculture without supply-control programs. We discuss options for policies addressing key concerns: economic efficiency, equity, the environment, instability, the family farm, and rural communities. The discussion is suggestive, not exhaustive, and is intended to stimulate thinking on how post-commodity program policy might better serve the needs of agriculture and the public at large.
Exact date of working paper unknown.
Rights:This item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law.
Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.