Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCautrell, Dion
dc.contributor.advisorJohnson, Nan
dc.creatorNalepa, Becca
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-08T13:20:10Z
dc.date.available2006-06-08T13:20:10Z
dc.date.issued2006-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/6569
dc.description.abstractThe political power of the rhetoric of science originates from the emphasis that is put on objective truth. To contribute to a fuller understanding of this trend and its consequences, I propose to present and analyze the rhetorical efficacy of a popular scientific textbook, Michael F. Guyer's Being Well-Born: An Introduction to Heredity and Eugenics (1927), in the context of the highly susceptible culture of turn-of-the-century America. By understanding how this text functioned during its publication, more than forty years after Francis Galton first coined the term “eugenics,” I can examine the cultural situation to which Guyer speaks. Guyer’s rhetorical strategies create an ethos of rationality, compassion, and morality, which influences and reassures his audience about the ethical and political necessity of accepting his conclusions. Understanding this conversation lends a greater understanding of current discourse surrounding fields that concern themselves with genetic engineering. Advisors: Dion Cautrell & Nan Johnsonen
dc.format.extent248480 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of English Honors Theses; 2006en
dc.subjectrhetoric of scienceen
dc.subjecteugenicsen
dc.titleThe rhetorical efficacy of Michael F. Guyer's Being Well-Bornen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.embargoen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record