Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShank, Barry
dc.creatorCrane, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-07T14:45:13Z
dc.date.available2006-06-07T14:45:13Z
dc.date.issued2006-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/6556
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines urban redevelopment projects in downtown Columbus, Ohio, with an interest in evaluating the degree to which contemporary strategies of such projects are performed in a way that is democratically accountable to those social actors for whom they produce social effects. I consider these effects with regard to the boundaries that define the places of urban redevelopment, and, rethinking those boundaries, I address a related concern with how democratic accountability should be evaluated. I approach the issue through recent literature about “Business Improvement Districts.” Narrating the emergence of projects in Columbus that have adopted— piecemeal or wholesale—elements of this BID-model, I present data from participant-observation work and interviews, describing the material and discursive effects of improvement district “symbolic strategies.” I indicate that those effects are not entirely accounted for in the recent literature related to the democratic accountability of the BID-model, and I examine how the leaders of improvement district organizations “perform accountability” in a way that, like the literature, brackets the discursively-evident effects from consideration. In conclusion, towards a revised standard of democratic accountability, I review theoretical considerations related to the place of improvement districts that may help us identify effects not recognized in recent literature, and not accounted for in contemporary redevelopment practices.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCollege of Arts and Sciences, Honors Program: "Undergraduate Research Scholarship"en
dc.format.extent218500 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Comparative Studies Honors Theses; 2006en
dc.subjectBusiness Improvement Districtsen
dc.subjectDemocratic Accountabilityen
dc.subjectPublic-Private Partnershipen
dc.subjectTextual Analysisen
dc.titleWho Belongs? What Belongs? Rethinking Democratic Accountability through the Growth Coalition and Textual Environment of Downtown Columbus, Ohioen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.embargoen
dc.rights.ccAttribution 2.5 Genericen_US
dc.rights.ccurihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 2.5 Generic
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 2.5 Generic