Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAndersen, Barbara
dc.creatorConley, Claire
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-03T20:49:05Z
dc.date.available2015-03-03T20:49:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/65310
dc.descriptionPoster Division: Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences: 1st Place (The Ohio State University Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum)en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Of the 230,000 annual cases of breast cancer, 20% of patients will recur at least once. There are no data examining psychological responses to 2nd recurrence. Available data point to differences between initial diagnosis and 1st recurrence, with patients with recurrence having lower functional status and reporting more pain, fatigue and relationship problems (Frost et al., 2000; Northouse et al., 2002; Sarenmalm, Öhlén, Odén, & Gaston-Johansson, 2008). Data documenting patients’ psychological responses to initial and 1st and 2nd recurrence breast cancer diagnoses is provided. Methods: Breast cancer patients (N=215) newly diagnosed with initial disease (n=90), or a 1st (n=108) or 2nd recurrence (n=17) were assessed at diagnosis and 4 months later. Measures of stress (IES), mood (POMS), quality of life (QoL; SF-36), sexual satisfaction (SEX), and nurse-rated Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were used. Linear regressions tested whether (1) recurrence status (none, 1st, 2nd), (2) time (baseline, 4 months), and (3) the interaction (recurrence status by time) predicted psychological outcomes. Results: All patients had reduced cancer stress, reduced negative mood, and improved mental QoL, but poorer physical QoL by 4 months (all ps<.05). Recurrence status significantly predicted lower SEX and lower KPS across time points (ps<.01). Across time, SEX and KPS were highest for initial diagnosis (SEX:M=4.4, KPS:M=86, respectively), middling for 1st recurrence (SEX:M=3.4, KPS:M=75), and lowest for 2nd recurrence patients (SEX:M=3.0, KPS:M=73). Conclusions: New data is provided showing that 2nd recurrence patients report lower sexual satisfaction and nurse rated performance status, but the level and change in their other psychological/QoL responses were comparable to those of other diagnosis groups. These data suggest that existing interventions to reduce stress and enhance coping might be applicable for all newly diagnosed patients, with any alterations focused on the unique problem areas within a group.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2015 Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum. 29then_US
dc.subjectcanceren_US
dc.subjectrecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectperformance statusen_US
dc.subjectsexual satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.titleSurviving Recurrence: Coping with the First and Seconden_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.description.embargoA three-year embargo was granted for this item.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record