Show simple item record

dc.creatorKahrl, Clyde C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-13T18:16:15Z
dc.date.available2015-02-13T18:16:15Z
dc.date.issued1979
dc.identifier.citationOhio State Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 3 (1979), 699-728.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0048-1572
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/65110
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State University. College of Lawen_US
dc.rightsThis item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law.en_US
dc.titleThe Attorney-Client Privilege, the Self-Evaluative Report Privilege, and Diversified Industries, Inc. v. Meredithen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record