Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHubbe, Mark
dc.creatorStreuli, Samantha
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-02T18:28:02Z
dc.date.available2014-04-02T18:28:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/59636
dc.descriptionSocial and Behavioral Sciences: 2nd Place (The Ohio State University Denman Undergraduate Research Forum)en_US
dc.description.abstractMultiple hominin species coexisted in Western Europe during the Pleistocene. Recent studies indicate that archaic Homo sapiens (i.e. H. heidelbergensis and H. antecessor) and Homo neanderthalensis possessed advanced cognitive abilities and adaptive strategies which were previously believed to be limited to anatomically modern Homo sapiens (AMHS). This information opens the possibility that the disappearance of archaic H. sapiens and Neanderthals was unrelated to an inability to compete with AMHS. If AMHS exhibited superior immune and behavioral adaptations that allowed them to better adjust to the environment already occupied by other hominins, then it is to be expected that their remains would exhibit fewer incidences of trauma and dental-skeletal pathological conditions than the remains of archaic hominins. To test this hypothesis, we present a comprehensive literature review of trauma and pathology observed among the Pleistocene fossils of archaic H. sapiens, Neanderthals, and AMHS at 32 Western European sites. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the differences among species. Considering skeletal trauma, no statistically significant difference among species has been shown. Although Neanderthals exhibited slightly higher frequencies of dental pathologies, no statistically significant difference has been shown. Archaic H. sapiens exhibited higher frequencies of infectious and congenital disease than Neanderthals, but not higher than AMHS. Despite inter-species differences, all Pleistocene hominins exhibited patterns of trauma and pathology that are within the range observed among later hunter-gatherers. This evidence supports the idea that archaic hominins were well adapted to their environment, and suggests that maladaptation was not a factor in their disappearance.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2014 Richard J. and Martha D. Denman Undergraduate Research Forum. 19then_US
dc.subjectpaleoanthropologyen_US
dc.subjectpaleopathologyen_US
dc.subjecthuman evolutionen_US
dc.titleTrauma and Pathology in Western European Hominins: Implications for Relative Adaptabilityen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.type.genrePosteren_US
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen_US
dc.rights.ccurihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/en_US
dc.description.academicmajorAcademic Major: Anthropologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States