Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPetty, Richard
dc.contributor.advisorLuttrell, Andrew
dc.creatorYang, Huidong
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-11T22:35:23Z
dc.date.available2013-12-11T22:35:23Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/58519
dc.descriptionArts and Sciences Research Scholarshipen_US
dc.descriptionSummer Research Fellowship - Psychologyen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Previous studies have shown that when persuasive messages contain appeals that match readers’ personal traits or characteristics (e.g., affective/cognitive bases of attitudes, attitude function and self-schema), the message can change people’s attitudes more. Matching the cultural values between messages and readers is another approach that can make the message more persuasive. Our study specifically focuses on the mechanism behind matching individualism-collectivism difference in cultures. That is, an individualistic person may find individualistic messages to be more persuasive than collectivistic messages, and vice versa. In other types of matching effects, matching produces more persuasion because it increases readers’ level of thinking (Brannon & McCabe 2008; Petty, Wheeler & Bizer, 2000; Wheeler, Petty, & Bizer, 2005). We believe that culture matching effects can lead to more persuasion for the same reason. That is, matching individualistic and collectivistic values in advertisements to a person’s own values leads to more persuasiveness only when the arguments are strong because matching really influences thinking toward the messages. In this study, we manipulated whether an advertisement appealed to individualistic vs. collectivistic values and whether the arguments in the message were strong or weak. We also measured participants’ individualism-collectivism differences using an established scale. The data partially supported our hypothesis; participants high in collectivism showed increased processing for the collectivistic (vs. individualistic) advertisement. However, the data for individualism did not show a significant preference for individualistic (vs. collectivistic) messages. These findings may be useful in advertising and health promotion that for matching effects to maximize its persuasiveness, we should also give strong arguments to the readers.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Psychology Undergraduate Research Theses; 2013en_US
dc.subjectCulture Matching Effects in Advertisingen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding Matching Effects in Advertisingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoNo embargoen_US
dc.rights.ccAttribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United Statesen_US
dc.rights.ccurihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/en_US
dc.description.academicmajorAcademic Major: Psychologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States