Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/52984

dc.creatorReich, Uli
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-13T01:52:39Z
dc.date.available2012-09-13T01:52:39Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.identifier.citationEmpirical Musicology Review, v7 n1-2 (Jan-Apr 2012), 85-87en_US
dc.identifier.issn1559-5749
dc.identifier.otherEMR0000138c
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18061/1811/52984
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/52984
dc.description.abstractIn this response paper, I argue that types of meanings in linguistic utterances which lie beyond propositional meaning can hardly be subsumed in only one category called implicational meaning. Many of these levels of meaning allow for restricted comparisons of their correspondence to levels of meaning in musical utterances.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmpirical Musicology Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEMR0000138cen_US
dc.subjectlevels of meaningen_US
dc.subjectmusic and languageen_US
dc.titleA Kaleidoscope of Meanings: A Comment on Philip Barnard "What Do We Mean by the Meanings of Music"en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record