Show simple item record

dc.creatorHawks, Carol Pitts
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-27T13:50:22Z
dc.date.available2012-04-27T13:50:22Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.citationCarol Pitts Hawks, "The INNOVACQ and Geac Acquisitions Systems Compared: A Large Academic Library Perspective," The Acquisitions Librarian 1, no. 1 (1989), doi: 10.1300/J101v01n01_12en_US
dc.identifier.issn0896-3576 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1544-435X (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/51803
dc.description.abstractThe INNOVACQ and Geac Acquisitions Systems have been successfully implemented in several large academic libraries. All basic requirements for a full-scale acquisitions system have been met by both systems. Size, as measured by number of orders placed or number of subscriptions maintained, magnifies the problems, deficiencies, and difficulties of any system. This paper focuses on significant differences between the two systems, particularly as they relate to large academic libraries. These areas include capacity, in-house control and environmental concerns, backup procedures and printing, command structure, record structure, integration versus interfacing, password security, serials control, invoicing and fund accounting, and management reports.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Haworth Press, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectInnovative Interfaces, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectGeac Acquisitions Systemsen_US
dc.subjectautomated systemsen_US
dc.subjectintegration versus interfacingen_US
dc.subjectserials controlen_US
dc.subjectinvoicing and fund accountingen_US
dc.subjectmanagement reportsen_US
dc.titleThe INNOVACQ and Geac Acquisitions Systems Compared: A Large Academic Library Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1300/J101v01n01_12
dc.identifier.osuauthordiedrichs.1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record