Causal Responsibility and Voting
MetadataShow full item record
Publisher:Ohio State University. Mershon Center for International Security Studies
Series/Report no.:Mershon Center for International Security Studies. Citizenship Series
Brennan's discussion was based off of a paper that is a response to a line of argument developed in a 1999 paper by Al Goldman and endorsed with minor modifications in Richard Tuck's book Free-Riding (Harvard University Press, 2008). The argument seeks to extend the scope of voter responsibility by appeal to a broadened account of causal efficacy. Goldman sees this argument as supplying moral reasons why individuals should vote and also as explaining why so many of them do vote. Brennan argued that in the voting case responsibility and causal efficacy should be maintained as independent notions, that Goldman's line yields the wrong advice for action-guidingness, and that the explanatory argument appeals to dubious logic.
Streaming video requires Flash Player, RealPlayer, or Windows Media Player to view.
Event Web page, streaming video, event photos
Ohio State University. Mershon Center for International Security Studies
Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.