Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWright, John
dc.creatorRybacki, Kelly
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-14T18:57:58Z
dc.date.available2011-03-14T18:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/48283
dc.description.abstractWhat factors led to victory for the Republican candidate in the 2010 governor’s race in Ohio? My research demonstrates that Democratic candidates are generally favored in Ohio counties with high unemployment. Ohio’s unemployment nearly doubled in size from 2006 to 2010. Why was Democratic incumbent Governor Ted Strickland unable to capitalize on this historical advantage? I argue that Strickland’s loss can be attributed to his inability to shift the “blame” onto the national level, due a Democratic president and Strickland’s visible ties to the Obama Administration. John Kasich was electorally successful because he was able to control the economic debate, verified through campaign and media output.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Political Science Honors Theses; 2011en_US
dc.subjectelectionen_US
dc.subjectgubernatorialen_US
dc.subjectohioen_US
dc.subjectgovernoren_US
dc.subjectcampaignen_US
dc.subjectpolitical scienceen_US
dc.titleBattle for the Buckeye State: Analysis of the 2010 Ohio Gubernatorial Raceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoNo embargoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record