Show simple item record

dc.creatorBondonio, Daniele
dc.creatorGreenbaum, Robert T.
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-10T01:08:06Z
dc.date.available2010-09-10T01:08:06Z
dc.date.issued2010-07
dc.identifier.other2010-001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/46842
dc.description.abstractWhile the importance of enterprise support policies in the EU continues to grow, there remains only limited empirical evidence examining the effects of the policies on socially relevant outcomes such as employment. This paper shows how to exploit firm-level data, formed by merging longitudinal employment and firm demographic information with the firm-level archives of the incentive payments, to offer robust counterfactual impact evaluation evidence on the employment effects of the coexisting European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) co-sponsored, national and regional programs commonly operated in many EU regions. The analysis uses data from a large northern Italian region and yields employment impacts of the policies under plausible identification assumptions, disentangling the impacts of different values of both the economic intensities of the program assistance and different forms of assistance (the latter distinguishing between capital grants and below-market interest rate/revolving loans). The paper finds that the absolute per-firm employment effects of the programs are increasingly larger the higher the economic value of the incentives awarded to the assisted firms. The incentives with the highest per-firm economic value, however, yield employment impacts with a much higher cost per each additional new job than incentives with a lower economic value. The results of the analysis also show that the absolute per-firm employment effects of soft loans are similar to those of capital grants. However, taking into consideration that soft loans bear a much lower cost in terms of public money devoted to the subsidies than capital grants, the impact estimates retrieved from analysis indicates that soft loans possess an higher employment effectiveness than capital grants.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Glenn School of Public Affairsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJohn Glenn School of Public Affairs. Working Paper Series. July 2010en_US
dc.subjectenterprise support programsen_US
dc.subjectcounterfactual impact evaluationen_US
dc.subjectinvestment grantsen_US
dc.subjectbelow market-rate Loansen_US
dc.titleCounterfactual Impact Evaluation of Enterprise Support Policies: An Empirical Application to EU Co-Sponsored, National and Regional Programsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unporteden_US
dc.rights.ccurihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported