The internal validity of web-based studies
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/34107
dc.creator | Lacherez, Philippe | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-09-05T14:51:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-09-05T14:51:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Empirical Musicology Review, v3 n3 (July 2008), 161-162 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1559-5749 | |
dc.identifier.other | EMR000035c | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/34107 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1811/34107 | |
dc.description.abstract | Honing and Ladinig (2008) make the assertion that while the internal validity of web-based studies may be reduced, this is offset by an increase in external validity possible when experimenters can sample a wider range of participants and experimental settings. In this paper, the issue of internal validity is more closely examined, and it is agued that there is no necessary reason why internal validity of a web-based study should be worse than that of a lab-based one. Errors of measurement or inconsistencies of manipulation will typically balance across conditions of the experiment, and thus need not necessarily threaten the validity of a study’s findings. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Empirical Musicology Review | en_US |
dc.subject | internal validity | en_US |
dc.subject | reliability | en_US |
dc.subject | web-based studies | en_US |
dc.title | The internal validity of web-based studies | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files in this item
Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.