Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMacGilvray, Eric
dc.creatorKrumm, Mitchell
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-05T21:34:07Z
dc.date.available2008-06-05T21:34:07Z
dc.date.issued2008-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/32213
dc.description.abstractJames Madison and Patrick Henry espoused two mutually exclusive systems to protect liberty. These differences came to a head at the Ratification debate in Virginia. The debate ranged over the history of protecting liberty to contemporary theories and political philosophies. Henry argued for a Bill of Rights while Madison argued that a system of strict Enumerated Powers would be the best protection for liberty. Madison had the better theory and won the debate but was forced to add a bill of rights to secure the ratification of the Constitution. This introduced two conflicting theories of protection for liberty that has led to damaging effects for liberty in America. To secure liberty in America, a return to Madison and the Federalists’ stated original intent is needed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Political Science Honors Theses; 2008en_US
dc.subjectBill of Rightsen_US
dc.subjectEnumerated Powersen_US
dc.subjectMadisonen_US
dc.subjectPatrick Henryen_US
dc.subjectVirginia Ratificationen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionen_US
dc.titleMadison, Henry, and the Protection of Libertyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoNo embargoen_US
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unporteden_US
dc.rights.ccurihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported