Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNygren, Thomas
dc.creatorEvans, Clarisse
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-14T17:45:43Z
dc.date.available2008-03-14T17:45:43Z
dc.date.issued2008-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/31831
dc.description.abstractThis study examined two different realms of regret, economic and relationship. Measures of regret were correlated in the two realms with self-efficacy, gender, and decision making styles (intuitive, analytical, regret-avoidant). Introductory psychology students took both the Decision-Making Styles Inventory (DMI) and a survey that was designed to induce regret in economical or relationship decision situations. Results indicated that males and females did not differ in their regret in relationship situations with the exception that females regretted more in a roommate disagreement scenario. Females were found to be higher in regret in two of the economic situations. Analytical decision making style was correlated with perceived regret in four of the situations (1 economic and 3 relationship) whereas self-efficacy was correlated with regret in the other four situations (3 relationship and 1 economic). This research calls for a new regret scale that takes into account gender and different realms of regret.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Psychology Honors Theses; 2008en_US
dc.subjectRegreten_US
dc.subjectDecision Making Stylesen_US
dc.subjectEconomicen_US
dc.subjectRelationshipsen_US
dc.subjectGender Differencesen_US
dc.subjectAnalyticalen_US
dc.titleThe Relevance of Context to Decision-Making Stylesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoNo embargoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record