Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/29396

dc.creatorCross, Ian
dc.creatorRohrmeier, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-01T14:38:04Z
dc.date.available2007-11-01T14:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2007-10
dc.identifier.citationEmpirical Musicology Review, v2 n4 (October 2007), 146-148en
dc.identifier.issn1559-5749
dc.identifier.otherEMR000026b
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18061/1811/29396
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/29396
dc.description.abstractAlthough the study by Bailes & Dean (2007) addresses an underresearched area of auditory and musical perception, it raises questions concerning stimuli, methodology, and the study's relation to previous research, that are outlined in this commentary.en
dc.format.extent181802 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEmpirical Musicology Reviewen
dc.subjectmusic perceptionen
dc.subjectsegmentationen
dc.subjectcognitive discriminationen
dc.subjectcomputer musicen
dc.subjecttimbreen
dc.titleComments on "Facilitation and Coherence Between the Dynamic and Retrospective Perception of Segmentation in Computer-Generated Music," by Freya Bailes and Roger T. Deanen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record