Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRudavsky, Tamar
dc.creatorDyckson, Ashley
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-13T14:38:17Z
dc.date.available2007-06-13T14:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/28513
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this thesis is to compare the solutions to the problem of human freewill that are proposed in two traditions: Medieval Christianity and early Buddhism. Both traditions hold that human actions are free. Both also attempt to justify their conceptions of freewill with regard to other, perhaps contradictory, beliefs that are also a part of each system. Medieval Christian philosophers attempted to prove that humans have freewill despite God’s is. The philosophers tried to resolve these issues by combining human freewill and limited omniscience. Freewill in the Buddhist tradition involves a law of cause and effect; human action is the result of this law. I believe that my research will conclude that there are similarities between the Buddhist and Christian attempts to explain human action and sin. To perform this research, I will analyze texts from both the medieval philosophical tradition and the Buddhist tradition.en
dc.format.extent534729 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe Ohio State Universityen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Ohio State University. Department of Philosophy Honors Theses; 2007en
dc.subjectFree Willen
dc.subjectChristianityen
dc.subjectBuddhismen
dc.subjectComparisonen
dc.titleFree Will: A Comparative Studyen
dc.typeThesisen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record