Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/24479

dc.creatorRepp, Bruno H.
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-31T21:21:52Z
dc.date.available2007-01-31T21:21:52Z
dc.date.issued2007-01
dc.identifier.citationEmpirical Musicology Review, v2 n1 (January 2007), 14-16en
dc.identifier.issn1559-5749
dc.identifier.otherEMR000021b
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18061/1811/24479
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/24479
dc.description.abstractTodd, Cousins, and Lee (2007) have presented some intriguing data suggesting that body size, as measured by standard anthropometric indices, is related to the preferred beat period in a perceptual task. Curiously, however, they did not find a significant sex difference, even though the women in their sample were clearly smaller than the men. Another recent study of preferred spontaneous tempo (McAuley et al., 2006) likewise failed to find a sex difference in a large sample of young adults. It is unclear why body size should have an effect only within each sex group.en
dc.format.extent185249 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEmpirical Musicology Reviewen
dc.subjectrhythmen
dc.subjectembodimenten
dc.subjectresonanceen
dc.titleEmbodied Rhythm: Commentary on "The Contribution of Anthropometric Factors to Individual Differences in the Perception of Rhythm" by Neil P. McAngus Todd, Rosanna Cousins, and Christopher S. Leeen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record