Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/24069

dc.creatorVos, Joos
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-13T15:40:22Z
dc.date.available2006-09-13T15:40:22Z
dc.date.issued2006-07
dc.identifier.citationEmpirical Musicology Review, v1 n3 (July 2006), 180-181en
dc.identifier.issn1559-5749
dc.identifier.otherEMR000008b
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18061/1811/24069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/24069
dc.description.abstractThe commentary asserts the importance of conducting additional research on additive dissonance, and points to the need for terminological precision in discussions of sensory versus systemic (i.e. learned, context-dependent) dissonance.en
dc.format.extent126937 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEmpirical Musicology Reviewen
dc.subjectconsonanceen
dc.subjectdissonanceen
dc.subjectsensoryen
dc.subjectphysiologicalen
dc.subjectcritical bandsen
dc.titleCommentary on "Calculating Sensory Dissonance: Some Discrepancies Arising from the Models of Kameoka & Kuriyagawa and Hutchinson & Knopoff" by Keith Mashinteren
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record