Show simple item record

dc.creatorPohlman, John T.en_US
dc.creatorLeitner, Dennis W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-07T18:34:05Z
dc.date.available2006-07-07T18:34:05Z
dc.date.issued2003-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Ohio Journal of Science. v103, n5 (December, 2003), 118-125en_US
dc.identifier.issn0030-0950en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/23983
dc.descriptionAuthor Institution: Department of Educational Psychology, Southern Illinois Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares ordinary least squares (OLS) and logistic regression in terms of their underlying assumptions and results obtained on common data sets. Two data sets were analyzed with both methods. In the respective studies, the dependent variables were binary codes of 1) dropping out of school and 2) attending a private college. Results of both analyses were very similar. Significance tests (alpha = 0.05) produced identical decisions. OLS and logistic predicted values were highly correlated. Predicted classifications on the dependent variable were identical in study 1 and very similar in study 2. Logistic regression yielded more accurate predictions of dependent variable probabilities as measured by the average squared differences between the observed and predicted probabilities. It was concluded that both models can be used to test relationships with a binary criterion. However, logistic regression is superior to OLS at predicting the probability of an attribute, and should be the model of choice for that application.en_US
dc.format.extent1101906 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Ordinary Least Squares and Logistic Regressionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record