Show simple item record

dc.creatorNewman, Isadoreen_US
dc.creatorNewman, Caroleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-07T18:05:58Z
dc.date.available2006-07-07T18:05:58Z
dc.date.issued1993-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Ohio Journal of Science. v93, n3 (June, 1993), 68-71en_US
dc.identifier.issn0030-0950en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/23564
dc.descriptionAuthor Institution: College of Education and Neoucom, The University of Akronen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a theoretical model which discusses the value of and need for the use of outcome rather than process evaluations of programs for the elderly. The theoretical framework is based on the highly successful philosophical model of statistical quality control used in industry, which assumes the best way to improve quality is to look at the outcomes. Most accreditation associations, such as the Joint Committee on the Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHCO), tend to emphasize process evaluations. It is the position of this paper that a change is needed which would shift that evaluation emphasis to assessing program outcome. The authors identify how outcome evaluations can be developed, taking into consideration need assessment, procedures, and multiple stakeholder concerns within the design of the evaluation. Also included is a discussion of the value of a learning and motivational approach rather than one that is punitive and judgmental.en_US
dc.format.extent389042 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleCentennial Symposium Paper: The Need for Outcome Rather Than Process Evaluationsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record