Show simple item record

dc.creatorWiedman, L. A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-07T02:10:20Z
dc.date.available2006-07-07T02:10:20Z
dc.date.issued1984-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Ohio Journal of Science. v84, n3 (June, 1984), 98-102en_US
dc.identifier.issn0030-0950en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/23004
dc.descriptionAuthor Institution: Department of Geological Sciences, Wright State Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractCriticisms have been raised about the inadequacies of methods in community paleoecological analysis. Until recently, most paleoecological studies were done by specialists in individual taxonomic groups. Because of this specialization, most data collected favored certain groups. Other fossils were either ignored, discounted, or loosely labelled qualitatively under descriptive terms as: rare, occasional or abundantly present. Ausich (1981) and Boucot (1981) have independently proposed methods of community analysis whereby the biovolume (shelly biomass) of all taxa present are quantified. To date, little has been done to substantiate the reproducibility of data obtained in this manner for level, soft-bottom, Paleozoic communities. A level, soft-bottom, Middle Devonian community is analyzed here using the sampling model proposed by Ausich (1981). Trends in the comparisons of biovolume to minimum number counts are shown to be reproducible as are trends in each of these catagories within individual horizontally continuous beds. Informational loss and quantitative reproducibility for this new method is shown to be an improvement over prior methodology.en_US
dc.format.extent656091 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleReproducibility of Biovolumetric Parameters in Community Reconstructionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record