Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/21904

dc.creatorClarke, Eric F.
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-22T18:06:02Z
dc.date.available2006-06-22T18:06:02Z
dc.date.issued2006-01
dc.identifier.citationEmpirical Musicology Review, v1 n1 (January 2006), 28-32en
dc.identifier.issn1559-5749
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18061/1811/21904
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/21904
dc.description.abstractErkki Huovinen’s “Varieties of Musicological Empiricism” provides a valuable analysis of some of the theoretical predicaments raised by pursuing an empirical musicology. But in this commentary, I argue for a less programmatic, and more pragmatic, approach to the term than he does. Empirical approaches in musicology have been around in one form or another for a long time, and the purpose of the label is less to identify a new ‘brand’ of musicology than to bring together a diversity of approaches that in different ways capitalise on the opportunities that data collection (in the broadest sense of the term) may provide. If programme is set aside in favour of pragmatism, and a looser relationship between theory and observation accepted, then empirical musicology can be a productive way to rub ideas up against a stimulatingly resistant world.en
dc.format.extent356508 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectempiricalen
dc.subjectempiricisten
dc.subjectpragmaticen
dc.titleCommentary on Huovinen's "Varieties of Musical Empiricism"en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record