Show simple item record

dc.creatorWang, Z. Z.en_US
dc.creatorDiffenderfer, R. N.en_US
dc.creatorShavitt, Isaiahen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-15T17:48:47Z
dc.date.available2006-06-15T17:48:47Z
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier1984-WH-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1811/16875
dc.description$^{1}$ R.A. Whiteside, R. Krishnan, D.J. Defrees, J.A. Pople, and P.v.R. Schleyer, Chem. Phys. Letters 78, 538 (1981). $^{\ast}$ Supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant CHE-8219408 and in part by Jilin University, Changchun, China.en_US
dc.descriptionAuthor Institution: Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University; Department of Chemistry, Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractElectronic structure calculations were carried out for the $C_{4}$ molecule in the linear $(^{3}\Sigma^{-}_{g})$ and rhombus (bicylic, $^{1}A_{g}$) configurations. The calculations used double-zeta (DZ) and DZ plus polarization (DZP) basis sets, and were carried out at the SCF (RHF), MCSCF, single-reference CI, and multireference CI levels. The geometries of the two structures were optimized at the MCSCF level, and the resulting bond lengths are greater by $0.03 - 0.09 {\AA}$ than those optimized by Whiteside $et al.^{1}$ at the SCF (UHF) level. The relative energies of the two structures are very sensitive to the basis set used and, to a lesser degree, to the type of wave function. The $D_{2}$ basis strongly favors the linear structure, but the energies of the two structures are comparable when the DZP basis is used.en_US
dc.format.extent600622 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeimage/jpeg
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherOhio State Universityen_US
dc.titleTHE ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE OF $C_{4}{^{\ast}}$en_US
dc.typearticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

Items in Knowledge Bank are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record