Addressing the Human Health Impacts of Climate Change: The Role of Individual Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs in Agency Action

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Show simple item record

Files Size Format View Description
KWaller_Honors_Thesis.pdf 1.892Mb PDF View/Open Main Article

dc.contributor.advisor Wilson, Robyn S.
dc.creator Waller, Kathryn C. 2012-06-07T15:51:55Z 2012-06-07T15:51:55Z 2012-06
dc.description.abstract Despite the scientific consensus that global climate change is currently underway, public health agencies in the United States fail to exemplify the practice of preparedness in anticipation of the negative impacts a changing climate will have on human health. It is critical to identify why public health agencies are not taking action so as to identify how to engage them in preparing the public for the most relevant health risks. Individual decisions based on values and personal beliefs rather than on scientific evidence might help explain why critical mitigation and adaptation measures are not in place to address the predicted health impacts of climate change. To that end, we surveyed Nursing Directors around the United States to determine how their individual attitudes, perceptions, beliefs, and knowledge about climate change and its related health impacts might help explain agency responses, or failures to respond, to such health risks. It was expected that female Nursing Directors with a positive environmental attitude and a liberal political ideology would have more positive attitudes toward taking action and higher perceptions of risk, responsibility, and control in relation to climate change and human health. The results of this study indicate that despite positive attitudes toward taking action, most departments do not have any programs in place and Nursing Directors often do not feel a personal sense of responsibility or departmental ability to take action. Environmental attitude, political ideology, risk perception, and perceived levels of control and responsibility each made unique contributions in explaining the variation in Nursing Directors’ attitudes towards action. Programs that provide information about the relevant health impacts, as well as work to increase individual directors’ sense of responsibility and risk and that are sensitive to political ideology may help motivate attitudes and behaviors conducive to taking action and increased public health preparedness. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Ohio State University Carbon, Water, and Climate T.I.E. Program en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Ohio State University Public Health Preparedness T.I.E. Program en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher The Ohio State University en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries The Ohio State University. School of Environment and Natural Resources Honors Theses; 2012 en_US
dc.subject climate change en_US
dc.subject public health en_US
dc.subject risk perception en_US
dc.subject climate adaptation en_US
dc.subject preparedness en_US
dc.subject risk communication en_US
dc.title Addressing the Human Health Impacts of Climate Change: The Role of Individual Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs in Agency Action en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.embargo No embargo en_US