OSU Navigation Bar

The Ohio State University University Libraries Knowledge Bank

The Knowledge Bank is scheduled for regular maintenance on Sunday, April 20th, 8:00 am to 12:00 pm EDT. During this time users will not be able to register, login, or submit content.

The Compliance Gap and the Efficacy of International Human Rights Institutions

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/49696

Show full item record

Files Size Format View Description
Mershon_DaiX_WebEvent_2011-04-28.pdf 334.8Kb PDF View/Open Event Web Page
Mershon_DaiX_photos_2011-04-28.pdf 717.2Kb PDF View/Open Event Photos
Mershon_kbdirect_DaiX_2011-04-28_flash.html 588bytes HTML View/Open Video (Flash Version)
Mershon_kbdirect_DaiX_2011-04-28_rm.html 522bytes HTML View/Open Video (RealPlayer Version)
Mershon_kbdirect_DaiX_2011-04-28_wmv.html 522bytes HTML View/Open Video (Windows Media Version)

Title: The Compliance Gap and the Efficacy of International Human Rights Institutions
Creators: Dai, Xinyuan; Mattiacci, Eleonora
Contributors: Sanders, Courtney
Keywords: compliance
human rights
international organizations
Issue Date: 2011-04-28
Publisher: Ohio State University. Mershon Center for International Security Studies
Series/Report no.: Mershon Center for International Security Studies. Globalizat​ion, Institutio​ns and Economic Security Workshop
Abstract: Dai discussed how recent studies of human rights treaties find that states increasingly endorse human rights norms but their behavior does not always or even usually conform to these norms. This gap between commitment and compliance is suggested to have persisted, if not increased. To many, such a gap would call into question the efficacy of international human rights institutions. She argues that the compliance gap, risks distorting the discrepancy between commitment and compliance. More important, to properly evaluate the effect of international human rights institutions, we must first understand the mechanisms by which seemingly weak international institutions impact states' policies indirectly through non-state actors and domestic politics.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/49696
Bookmark and Share