OSU Navigation Bar

The Ohio State University University Libraries Knowledge Bank

The Knowledge Bank is scheduled for regular maintenance on Sunday, April 20th, 8:00 am to 12:00 pm EDT. During this time users will not be able to register, login, or submit content.

The East Asian Developmental State is Dead

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/49224

Show full item record

Files Size Format View Description
Mershon_GlassmanJ_WebEvent_2011-05-10.pdf 335.4Kb PDF View/Open Event Web Page
Mershon_GlassmanJ_photos_2011-05-10.pdf 639.6Kb PDF View/Open Event Photos
Mershon_kbdirect_GlassmanJ_2011-05-10_flash.html 588bytes HTML View/Open Video (Flash Version)
Mershon_kbdirect_GlassmanJ_2011-05-10_rm.html 522bytes HTML View/Open Video (RealPlayer Version)
Mershon_kbdirect_GlassmanJ_2011-05-10_wmv.html 522bytes HTML View/Open Video (Windows Media Version)

Title: The East Asian Developmental State is Dead
Creators: Glassman, Jim
Contributors: Sanders, Courtney
Keywords: East Asia
South Korea
development state
Issue Date: 2011-05-10
Publisher: Ohio State University. Mershon Center for International Security Studies
Series/Report no.: Mershon Center for International Security Studies. Citizenship Speaker Series
Abstract: The East Asian developmental state is dead ... or, better, as it has been conceived by its major neo-Weberian theorists, it never lived. Thus, while some contemporary commentators on East Asian political economy have lamented the decline of the developmental state in key sites of its former dominance, like South Korea, I argue that the developmental state was always a different entity than it was made out to be by those who have promoted it as an alternative to neoliberalism. Examining the case of South Korean chaebol (conglomerates) in the 1960s-70s (the key period of South Korea's "take-off"), I suggest a better characterization of the developmental state is that it was a Cold War-military contractor-developmental state, one whose performance in fomenting rapid economic and industrial growth is not replicable because of the unique geographical-historical circumstance that brought it into being — and is not desirable because of the consequences that this state's performance had for others in East Asia.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/49224
Bookmark and Share