Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Enterprise Support Policies: An Empirical Application to EU Co-Sponsored, National and Regional Programs

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Show simple item record

Files Size Format View Description
gs_wps_Bondonio_Greenbaum_2010-001.pdf 1.061Mb PDF View/Open Document

dc.creator Bondonio, Daniele
dc.creator Greenbaum, Robert T. 2010-09-10T01:08:06Z 2010-09-10T01:08:06Z 2010-07
dc.identifier.other 2010-001
dc.description.abstract While the importance of enterprise support policies in the EU continues to grow, there remains only limited empirical evidence examining the effects of the policies on socially relevant outcomes such as employment. This paper shows how to exploit firm-level data, formed by merging longitudinal employment and firm demographic information with the firm-level archives of the incentive payments, to offer robust counterfactual impact evaluation evidence on the employment effects of the coexisting European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) co-sponsored, national and regional programs commonly operated in many EU regions. The analysis uses data from a large northern Italian region and yields employment impacts of the policies under plausible identification assumptions, disentangling the impacts of different values of both the economic intensities of the program assistance and different forms of assistance (the latter distinguishing between capital grants and below-market interest rate/revolving loans). The paper finds that the absolute per-firm employment effects of the programs are increasingly larger the higher the economic value of the incentives awarded to the assisted firms. The incentives with the highest per-firm economic value, however, yield employment impacts with a much higher cost per each additional new job than incentives with a lower economic value. The results of the analysis also show that the absolute per-firm employment effects of soft loans are similar to those of capital grants. However, taking into consideration that soft loans bear a much lower cost in terms of public money devoted to the subsidies than capital grants, the impact estimates retrieved from analysis indicates that soft loans possess an higher employment effectiveness than capital grants. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher John Glenn School of Public Affairs en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries John Glenn School of Public Affairs. Working Paper Series. July 2010 en_US
dc.subject enterprise support programs en_US
dc.subject counterfactual impact evaluation en_US
dc.subject investment grants en_US
dc.subject below market-rate Loans en_US
dc.title Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Enterprise Support Policies: An Empirical Application to EU Co-Sponsored, National and Regional Programs en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported en_US
dc.rights.ccuri en_US
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported