The Best of the Best Ranking and Rating Digital Reference Resources

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Show full item record

Files Size Format View
DiazK_Ref_User_Ser_Qtrly_v.39_no.1_1999_p17-21.pdf 313.5Kb PDF View/Open

Title: The Best of the Best Ranking and Rating Digital Reference Resources
Creators: Diaz, Karen R.
Keywords: utility of digital references
Web site ranking criteria
Web site rating criteria
Issue Date: 1999
Citation: Karen R. Diaz, "The Best of the Best Ranking and Rating Digital Reference Resources," Reference and User Services Quarterly 39, no. 1 (1999): 17-21.
Abstract: What makes a Web site the best? There are myriad answers. What makes a Web site the best For reference? Even though the question is more specific, there are still many answers. A high-quality site can be hard to define in generic terms. In describing the process of selecting the top reference titles for the year, Lawrence similarly asked, "As for the pertinent question, what constitutes an outstanding reference title? Ask ten people, or librarians anyway, and you will get as many answers." It has been said, in fact, that quality is like art—it's hard to define, but you know it when you see it. Increasing attempts are being made to provide evaluated, high-quality Web surfing. Some of this is done by meta-site creation. These resources imply that a site is "good" if it's in the guide. Many examples of these sorts of sites available by and for libraries and their constituents exist. However, some resources go beyond simple listing and provide actual ranking, rating, and evaluation of sites, which can lean toward either the subjective or the scientific and are hard to do well without selection and ranking criteria. This column examines various examples of Web site rankings or ratings and attempts to enumerate the vast possibilities of criteria for evaluation.
ISSN: 0033-7072 (Print)
1094-9054 (Online)
Bookmark and Share
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported